Bayport Polymers LLC v. CB&I, LLC [2024]

Beneficiary Bayport Polymers appealed temporary injunction restraining presentation of LC documents.

đź’ˇ
Bayport Polymers LLC v. CB&I, LLC
No. 14-23-00643-CV, slip op. (Tex. App. July 23, 2024) [USA]

Type of Lawsuit: Beneficiary appealed temporary injunction restraining presentation of LC documents.

Topics: Breach of Contract; Injunction; Material Fraud; UCC Rev. Section 5-102; UCC Section 5-103; UCC Section 5-108; UCC Section 5-109(b); Prior UCC Section 5-114.

Parties:
• Appellant/Defendant/Beneficiary – Bayport Polymers, LLC (d/b/a Baystar)
• Appellee/Plaintiff/Contractor/Applicant – CB&I LLC
• Issuer – unspecified

Underlying Transaction: One of two large engineering and construction projects of a polyethylene plant.

LC: Approximately USD 75 million standby LC; silent at choice of law and practice rules; Texas Rev. Article 5 applied.

Decision: The Court of Appeals of Texas, 14th District, Jewell, Poissant and Bourliot, JJ., reversed and remanded.

Rationale: (1) Appellate review of trial order will not unduly place form over substance were reasons for decision are in writing and unambiguous; (2) under Texas law, “lack of colorable right” is not sole basis to restrain LC beneficiary from presenting documents; and (3) temporary LC injunction vacated where trial court misapplied established facts of case and Tex. UCC Rev. Section 5-109(b); applicant failed to show that alleged fraud was so egregious to vitiate entire transaction.

Factual Summary:

To support its engineering and construction work on a high-density polyethylene plant in Bayport, Texas, CB&I, LLC (Contractor/Applicant) applied for and caused an unspecified issuing bank to issue a standby letter of credit in favor of Bayport Polymers, LLC (Beneficiary). A key metric in Contractor/Applicant’s progress was “RFHI Completion” whereby Beneficiary would be able to introduce hydrocarbons into the plant. This completion date was originally expected for about one-thousand days after the effective contract date of October 8, 2021. Each week past planned completion would result in liquidated damages owed by Contractor/Applicant (capped at 6% of contract value). Beneficiary could pursue such damages in three ways: (1) invoice Contractor/Applicant for damages with a 30-day due date; (2) withhold amounts already due and payable to Contractor/Applicant; or (3) “collect on either letter of credit”.

đź’ˇ
Cases Referenced:
• SRS Products. Co. v. LG Engineering Co., 994 S.W.2d 380 (Tex. App. 1999)
• Philipp Bros., Inc. v. Oil Country Specialists, Ltd., 787 S.W.2d 38 (Tex. 1990)

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Documentary Credit World.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.