Counter Guarantor’s Sanctions Clause: How Does It Impact The Guarantor?

A DCW reader asked about the impact of a specific clause in a counter guarantee issued by a US bank under ISP98 and Saudi law. This clause raises concerns about the presentation of documents and potential payment restrictions

From June 2013's DCW

A DCW Reader Writes:
May I have your opinion on the following query:

A Counter Guarantor Bank issued its Counter Guarantee in favor of a Guarantor (Bank). The Counter Guarantee is subject to ISP98, whereas the Guarantee that will be issued by the Guarantor is subject to Saudi Law.

Guarantee is payable against presentation of a simple demand.

The Counter Guarantor (domiciled in USA) incorporated the following paragraph in their Counter Guarantee indemnity:

📄
PRESENTATION OF DOCUMENT(S) THAT ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE ANTI-BOYCOTT, ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING, ANTI-TERRORISM, ANTIDRUG TRAFFICKING, EXPORT DENIAL OR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS LAWS, REGULATIONS OR ORDERS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. APPLICABLE LAWS VARY DEPENDING ON THE TRANSACTION AND MAY INCLUDE UNITED NATIONS, UNITED STATES AND/OR LOCAL LAWS.


a) What is the impact of this paragraph on the document (simple demand)?

b) Is there any requirement of a document/certificate that should be presented by the Guarantor to the Counter Guarantor in the event that there is a call for payment?

I am aware of the ICC Guidance Paper on the Use of Sanction Clauses for Trade Related but am unsure if it is useful in this situation.

DCW Responds:

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Documentary Credit World.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.