💡
Pacific Atlantic Pipeline Construction Inc. v.
Coastal Gaslink Ltd. [2024]
2024 ABCA 74 (Can. Alta. C.A. Mar. 5, 2024) [Canada]
Type of Case: Applicant appealed denial of interlocutory injunction against standby Beneficiary.
Topics: Appeal; Arbitration; Autonomy (Independence) Principle; Contract Formation; Fraud; Good Faith; Injunction; Standard of Proof; Standby LC
Parties:
• Appellant/Contractor/Applicant – Pacific Atlantic Pipeline Construction Inc.
• Respondent/Principal/Beneficiary – Coastal Gaslink Ltd.
• Second Appellant/Contractor Owner – Bonatti, S.p.A.
• Issuer – HSBC Bank Canada
Underlying Transaction: Construction of liquid natural gas pipeline.
LC: Standby LC for CAD 117,162,384. Choice of law and practice rules not mentioned.
Decision: The Court of Appeal of Alberta, Crighton, Pentelechuk and Antonio, JJ., affirmed.
Rationale: Judgment affirmed where no reviewable error in trial application of higher standard of proof regarding interlocutory injunction on letter of credit demand by applicant against beneficiary; strong prima facie case standard applies regardless of whether action is taken against bank or LC beneficiary, or whether claim is fraud or breach of express forbearance agreement.
Factual Summary:
At the request of its customer, Pacific Atlantic Pipeline Construction Inc. (Contractor/Applicant), HSBC Bank Canada (Issuer) issued a CAD 117,162,384 standby letter of credit in favour of Coastal Gaslink Ltd. (Principal/Beneficiary). Contractor/Applicant, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bonatti, S.p.A. (Contractor Owner), was engaged by Principal/Beneficiary in 2012 to construct certain sections of a liquid natural gas pipeline in British Columbia (the Contract). The standby LC was obtained to support performance by Contractor/Applicant.
Read the full story
Sign up
now to read the full story and get access to all posts for
paying subscribers only.
Subscribe